- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:02:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21104 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> --- (In reply to comment #0) > 1.2.2 SCDM - Secure Content Decryption Module > > This section is non-normative. > > The Secure Content Decryption Module (SCDM) is a generic term for a > CDM for which the user is technically able to access the digital > decrypted output of the CDM on user implemented web browsers and/or on > user implemented operating systems including open source > implementations. The SCDM will typically offer transport level > security to prevent copying of the content by a third party while in > transit to the users computer, I think EME shouldn't pretend to involve CDMs for use cases like this. AFAICT, the proponents of EME don't intend to deploy EME solely for transport-level security. Transport-level security is already addressed by https. If there truly was demand for masking content on CDNs from CDN operators, we should address that case with Hixie's http+aes—not with EME. I object to EME suggesting that it addresses use cases of this kind. > 1.2.3 DRM-CDM - a Digital Rights Management Content Decryption Module The real use cases for EME seem to involve only this sort of CDMs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 07:02:37 UTC