- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:02:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21104
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi
--- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 1.2.2 SCDM - Secure Content Decryption Module
>
> This section is non-normative.
>
> The Secure Content Decryption Module (SCDM) is a generic term for a
> CDM for which the user is technically able to access the digital
> decrypted output of the CDM on user implemented web browsers and/or on
> user implemented operating systems including open source
> implementations. The SCDM will typically offer transport level
> security to prevent copying of the content by a third party while in
> transit to the users computer,
I think EME shouldn't pretend to involve CDMs for use cases like this. AFAICT,
the proponents of EME don't intend to deploy EME solely for transport-level
security. Transport-level security is already addressed by https. If there
truly was demand for masking content on CDNs from CDN operators, we should
address that case with Hixie's http+aes—not with EME.
I object to EME suggesting that it addresses use cases of this kind.
> 1.2.3 DRM-CDM - a Digital Rights Management Content Decryption Module
The real use cases for EME seem to involve only this sort of CDMs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 07:02:37 UTC