- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:56:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20964 Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steele@adobe.com --- Comment #6 from Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > Firstly, the notion of 'streaming' is an artificial construct of the DRM > industry that has no technical foundation and is foreign to the working of > the web browser. Web browsers are free to store content to their capacity > for presentation at the will of the user. If videos content authors wish to > present content on the web browser then they need to respect the operation > of the platform rather than attempting to re-purpose it for their own market > segmentation goals. You may be thinking only of streaming video in the VOD (video on demand) model. There are other use cases for streaming video, e.g. low latency live/near-live events, variable bitrate, large scale viewing, etc. This method for delivering content is useful entirely independent of whether or not DRM is in use. > > Secondly, the possible existence of one 'unrestricted' CDM model does not > discount the fact that the EME interface frustrates the viewing of content > without a live server. Further, we need to keep in mind the legal > constraint that in some jurisdictions normal web browser storage and > presentation operations that works around such 'frustrations' may well be > illegal and we have a duty of care to web users not to expose them to such > threats. > > In summary, the technical existence of any mode of operation that frustrates > the viewing of content after server has been decommissioned is a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 22:56:51 UTC