- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:56:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20964
Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steele@adobe.com
--- Comment #6 from Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Firstly, the notion of 'streaming' is an artificial construct of the DRM
> industry that has no technical foundation and is foreign to the working of
> the web browser. Web browsers are free to store content to their capacity
> for presentation at the will of the user. If videos content authors wish to
> present content on the web browser then they need to respect the operation
> of the platform rather than attempting to re-purpose it for their own market
> segmentation goals.
You may be thinking only of streaming video in the VOD (video on demand) model.
There are other use cases for streaming video, e.g. low latency live/near-live
events, variable bitrate, large scale viewing, etc. This method for delivering
content is useful entirely independent of whether or not DRM is in use.
>
> Secondly, the possible existence of one 'unrestricted' CDM model does not
> discount the fact that the EME interface frustrates the viewing of content
> without a live server. Further, we need to keep in mind the legal
> constraint that in some jurisdictions normal web browser storage and
> presentation operations that works around such 'frustrations' may well be
> illegal and we have a duty of care to web users not to expose them to such
> threats.
>
> In summary, the technical existence of any mode of operation that frustrates
> the viewing of content after server has been decommissioned is a problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 22:56:51 UTC