- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:07:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21045 --- Comment #5 from Masatoshi Kimura <VYV03354@nifty.ne.jp> --- (In reply to comment #4) > Just to be complete: the HTML5.1 spec constructor also agrees: > http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/embedded-content-0.html#the-img-element Please see http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content-0.html#the-img-element and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20554 The named constructor definition is [NamedConstructor=Image(optional unsigned long width, optional unsigned long height)] there which disagrees your URL. Where is the latest spec? This is the very example of the confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 11:07:16 UTC