- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:15:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20961 --- Comment #6 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > As noted before, the specification does not define the scope of privileges > required by a CDM, so it is not possible to assess the validity of your > claim that 'EME does not depend on any such privileged access.'. Please > include the scope of privileges that the CDM requires has so we can all > assess the technical merits of this claim. How is this different from video codecs ? The specification does ont define the 'scope of privileges' required by video codecs either. We expect UA implementations to pay attention to the access they give to components such as this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 22:15:38 UTC