[Bug 24081] There may be use cases for calling update() in states other than PENDING from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2013-12-12 (public-html-bugzilla@w3.org from December 2013)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:19:54 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-24081-2486-T20ByEe7E4@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24081

Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |LATER

--- Comment #1 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> ---
As I discussed in Bug 21854, I don't think we should allow this unless we have
a specific need to do so. It is easier to allow this later if implementation
experience shows that we need it than to allow it now and choose to remove this
later.

I am resolving this LATER to see if we get this from implementation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 23:19:55 UTC