[Bug 21854] Define MediaKeySession life cycle states and/or events

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21854

--- Comment #26 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> ---
(In reply to David Dorwin from comment #25)
> (In reply to Adrian Bateman [MSFT] from comment #24)
> > I'm not sure we should change the spec unless we know of specific
> > use cases where we don't want to limit it to this. We could wait to see if
> > implementation experience suggests this is actually needed? I think we need
> > to specify what to do if you call update() and it is not expected. Should it
> > be silently ignored or should you get a state error.
> 
> Why do UAs/CDMs need to be "expecting" an update() call? I assumed they
> would just always process the input and decide what to do?
> 
> As for use cases, an app could proactively provide a renewal message, a new
> key, etc. I imagine there might be some more complex uses cases where
> operations need to be performed on the session as well.

I have filed Bug 24081 to track this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 23:12:54 UTC