- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:28:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24025 --- Comment #2 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- That makes sense, but I think we might need to then define the possible configuration values: Looking at the WebIDL spec, I'm not sure you can have a parameter of type "dictionary". Instead, the examples and algorithms show and imply, respectively, use of a dictionary definition. If we can determine a likely set of member, that might be okay and would allow us to define the members in the spec (helping with interop) while maintaining extensibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 18:28:03 UTC