- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:02:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/fdb9ff6bafb3972288081a075790d0dd8ec39faa Rationale: After reviewing the historical and current discussions and articles discussing on the definition of cite[(for example) 1], and usage in the wild , I agree with comment 1 that it should be allowed to be used (as it already is) to identify the author of quoted text. I have also widened the definition to allow cite to include all citation information in the case of academic citation formats such as MLA or Chicago [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Cite_element http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/on-citing-quotations-again/ http://oli.jp/2011/blockquote/ http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 10:02:20 UTC