- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:52:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22854 Bug ID: 22854 Summary: "4.8.1.1.17" Logos, including the word "logo" in ALT Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: david100@sympatico.ca QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org "4.8.1.1.17" Logos, insignia, flags, or emblems Quite a few, but not all, accessibility people think the word "Logo" should be included in the ALT for a logo. WCAG was divided on it about a year ago when this came up. If the logo is a link then I can see the rational of not adding the word "logo", because the focus is on describing the link destination (although I don't object to including "logo" in this use case)... however, a logo is a legal symbol, and is very specific... if it is not linked then I would suggest it needs the word "logo" in the alt. <img src="images/webplatform1.png" alt="web platform logo"> WebPlatform.org I've spoken with several from the blind community about this who feel the word "logo" does not make the alt too chatty, and it gives useful information about the graphic. When I asked for opinions on this in HTML5 meeting Aug 1, 2013, Janina said that the word "logo" is "critical", (see minutes.) At the *very* least I think we should mention that the use of the word "logo" is optional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 16:52:11 UTC