- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:52:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22854
Bug ID: 22854
Summary: "4.8.1.1.17" Logos, including the word "logo" in ALT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: david100@sympatico.ca
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org,
public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org
"4.8.1.1.17" Logos, insignia, flags, or emblems
Quite a few, but not all, accessibility people think the word "Logo" should be
included in the ALT for a logo. WCAG was divided on it about a year ago when
this came up.
If the logo is a link then I can see the rational of not adding the word
"logo", because the focus is on describing the link destination (although I
don't object to including "logo" in this use case)... however, a logo is a
legal symbol, and is very specific... if it is not linked then I would suggest
it needs the word "logo" in the alt.
<img src="images/webplatform1.png" alt="web platform logo"> WebPlatform.org
I've spoken with several from the blind community about this who feel the word
"logo" does not make the alt too chatty, and it gives useful information about
the graphic.
When I asked for opinions on this in HTML5 meeting Aug 1, 2013, Janina said
that the word "logo" is "critical", (see minutes.)
At the *very* least I think we should mention that the use of the word "logo"
is optional.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 16:52:11 UTC