- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:44:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21328
Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |acolwell@google.com
--- Comment #5 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm reopening this bug, which is related to the just filed
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21819. I don't have a strong
> opinion about whether the term "encoded" or "editable unit" is used, but
> "compressed" is the wrong term.
I agree that 'compressed' is the wrong term, but I still maintain my position
that "editable unit" and "essence frame" is not a better option then the
current term. If "coded frame" is still objectionable, I could change this to
"media frame", but I still think in most cases that the "frames" will be coded
in some form and require "decoding" in some sense of the word.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 21:44:59 UTC