- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:54:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20740
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Component|HTML5 spec |HTML
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Product|HTML WG |WHATWG
Target Milestone|--- |Unsorted
QA Contact|public-html-bugzilla@w3.org |contributor@whatwg.org
--- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> ---
Please file only one issue per bug.
I can't really make head or tail of comment 0. The suggested terms don't seem
any clearer than the current terms. If you would like to discuss specific
terminology changes, I recommend filing a separate bug that just covers that
topic (http://whatwg.org/newbug if you want me to be the one to process it.)
Regarding <h>, this has been considered before, and is a non-starter. <h1> is
exactly what the proposed <h> would be, and already works, and has numerous
additional benefits (like being compatible with <h2>-<h6> which you may wish to
use to remain compatible with legacy UAs).
Regarding comment 2, I don't understand what's unclear (and yes, the grammar
there seems to be correct English). Please file a new bug if there is something
unclear that you would like me to handle (again, use http://whatwg.org/newbug
if you want me to be the one to process it).
Regarding comment 3, I assume it was an oversight that this was assigned to me
but left in the HTMLWG component. Moving to WHATWG component since apparently
the HTMLWG doesn't want the bug any more (?).
Marking WONTFIX since I'm not changing the spec yet, but really this is
NEEDSINFO except that I'd like the additional information in separate new bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 April 2013 07:54:33 UTC