- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:13:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21627 --- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> --- First, the term "deprecated" does not apply since we are still not in REC state. If an external organization references a not yet complete (i.e., not yet REC) W3C specification, then they must take the risk of having that spec change before arriving at REC. Second, as I mention, the fielded implementations are effectively experimental, and as Sylvia indicates, little impact is expected by reworking the TTC constructor signature. Third, this is the purpose of having a CR period, otherwise known as "Call for Implementations", in which experience can be gathered and fed back to the spec process. It is a general understanding that this process may end up producing changes in the spec. Fourth, it is well recognized that the VTT specification material in HTML5 was due to be moved to another specification, and that what remained behind should be sufficiently generic to accommodate different text track content types. So what Sylvia is suggesting is already well understood and consistent with expectations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 16:13:34 UTC