- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:35:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21501 --- Comment #1 from Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> --- I thought about this. My thinking was not to do it. What a conformance checker needs to know is: - there should be zero or one instances of the description; - the content should be one non-empty valid URL; Which is already in the spec. I think the rest goes into best practices and techniques, and I don't think we should fill the normative spec with them. I propose to resolve as wontfix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:35:07 UTC