[Bug 17118] New: html anchor tags 1) Did I miss it, or did you forget to mention name= attribute? (You did mention href='#name", so I suppose it is still valid) 2) To lessen need for JavaScript could you give an option that makes it work like location.replace so a new ent

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17118

           Summary: html anchor tags 1) Did I miss it, or did you forget
                    to mention name= attribute? (You did mention
                    href='#name", so I suppose it is still valid) 2) To
                    lessen need for JavaScript could you give an option
                    that makes it work like location.replace so a new ent
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html5-20120329/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top

Comment:
html anchor tags
1) Did I miss it, or did you forget to mention name= attribute? (You did
mention href='#name", so I suppose it is still valid)
2) To lessen need for JavaScript could you give an option that makes it work
like location.replace so a new entry is not added to history object.
3) To lessen need for JavaScript, when using Target could give an option
essential can refocus the cursor to inside the target window?

Howard_Cary_Morris@hotmail.com

Posted from: 98.66.7.23
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/12.0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 20 May 2012 00:30:32 UTC