- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:26:27 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17030 Summary: Lists should permit interleaved structuring Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: bugzilla@francisdavey.co.uk QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org It is common for lawyers to use numbered lists extensively, for example in contracts and statutes. It is good style, and logical, to be able to group parts of such a document using some form of document structuring and to give parts of the document headings. Doing this job properly in html is, at the moment, not possible if one wishes to obey the DTD: <ol> may only have <li> as children. I write a lot of website terms and conditions and I would like to use HTML more widely as a source document for legal works. I am unhappy at having to adopt hacks to achieve this or to change, what seems to me a useful semantics for no good reason. I would not be surprised if this kind of interleaving was not also desirable in other contexts. I suggest it would be useful to be able to markup numbering in a way that would allow at least headings and possible other structuring such as <section> to be interleaved with that numbering. To that end, could the <h?> tags <hgroup> and <section> be allowed as children of <ol>? I realise there are hacks that would allow this. They are all quite ugly and in some cases rather awkward. I can also see no good reason for the restriction. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 14:26:34 UTC