- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:29:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17094 --- Comment #7 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> 2012-06-19 15:29:15 UTC --- When you say "compatible with HLS" do you mean (1) Any segments compatible with HLS will also be compatible with the requirements here, or (2) Segments compatible with the requirements here are also compatible with HLS, or (3) both of the above ? (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Created attachment 1142 [details] [details] [details] > > > Updated version of the MPEG-2 TS text > > > > Are these requirement compatible with the HLS spec > > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-08)? > Yes, they are.(In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Created attachment 1142 [details] [details] [details] > > > Updated version of the MPEG-2 TS text > > > > Are these requirement compatible with the HLS spec > > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-08)? > Yes, they are -- they are actually a bit stricter than HLS. > > > While I'm not a huge fan of including MPEG-2 TS in the spec, I can understand > > why some would want it. I want to make sure HLS can be supported if we decide > > to include this. > +1. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 15:29:22 UTC