- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:00:34 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17429 Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> 2012-06-07 08:00:34 UTC --- If you're looking just at the W3C HTML spec itself only, that does actually preclude the possibility of the meta element being using in the body atl, because it classifies meta strictly as metadata content, which is only allowed within the head element. But the Microdata spec says that if a meta element has an itemprop attribute, that makes it flow content and phrasing content, which allows it to be used in the body. But it also adds the restriction that If a meta element has an itemprop attribute, the name, http-equiv, and charset attributes must be omitted. http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/#other-changes-to-html5 So that means meta@name is never allowed in the body. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 08:00:43 UTC