- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:51:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18397 Summary: Encoding Sniffing Algorithm: Clarify what "infoformation on the likely encoding" covers Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview#encoding-sniffin g-algorithm OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Please clarify what the step 'information on the likely encoding" covers. For instance, does it cover the XML encoding declaration? Why? Why not? In 2012, Chrome, Safari and Opera 12 still reads the XML encoding declaration when/if the HTMl encoding declaration is lacking. In october 2009, Ian Hickson wrote: "So in the absence of more compelling reasons to add this, I'd rather get Opera and WebKit to remove the support for this, than add more" [1] However, it seems to me that the step "information on the likely encoding" would cover their asses. After all, the presence of <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> increases the chance that the encoding is UTF-8. May be the algorithm could be specific on what is allowed and what is not allowed in this step? The spec should therefore offer more data on what this step of the sniffing algorithm refers to. Also see my blog post for more data.[2] [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-October/023670.html [2] http://målform.no/blog/white-spots-in-html5-s-encoding-sniffing-algorithm -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 13:51:32 UTC