- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:41:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17774 Summary: "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the -hgroup-element OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, simonp@opera.com This was was cloned from bug 14707 as part of operation convergence. Originally filed: 2011-11-06 09:26:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2011-11-06 09:26:17 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-hgroup-element Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-hgroup-element Comment: "For the purposes of document summaries, outlines, and the like," should be treated as a UI issue, and should not be restricted in what text to use. It is e.g. resonable to join the headings with ": " if the hgroup is used for heading+subheading. Posted from: 85.227.157.105 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.21 Safari/535.7 ================================================================================ #1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-11-11 00:20:51 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That seems reasonable. Do you think we should remove the paragraph entirely, or do you think there is value in some weaker wording as implementation advice? If the latter, what do you think it should say? ================================================================================ #2 Simon Pieters 2011-11-11 07:18:30 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Either is fine with me. ================================================================================ #3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-12-07 23:19:42 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'll nuke the paragraph and make sure there's an example somewhere that gives sample behaviour. ================================================================================ -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 18:41:42 UTC