- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:56:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17283 --- Comment #6 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> 2012-07-10 16:56:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Is there an IDL attribute I can use to make "null" stringify to empty on > setting for a DOMString IDL attribute, or does it have to be prose? [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]; however, I think that what Simon proposes makes more sense. I filed <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772526>. (Another question is what to do with non-DOMString reflecting attributes; I'm not sure if we'd want to make the same change there in the same time frame, because that's somewhat hard with our current bindings.) (In reply to comment #5) > (is there a corresponding bug on WebIDL about changing the behaviour for all > attributes?) We agreed not to do that; I think we can and should stay with that decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 16:57:01 UTC