- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:28:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17094 --- Comment #11 from Alex Giladi <alex.giladi@huawei.com> 2012-07-03 23:28:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > When you say "compatible with HLS" do you mean > > > > (1) Any segments compatible with HLS will also be compatible with the > > > > requirements here, or > > > > (2) Segments compatible with the requirements here are also compatible with > > > > HLS, or > > > > (3) both of the above > > > > > > > > > > Ideally (3) if that is reasonable to do. If not then I'd prefer to fall back to > > > (2) so that existing content could be slightly modified to work with existing > > > clients and the Media Source Extensions. > > (2), with (3) happening nearly always. > > > > The difference is that HLS does not disallow "bad practices" that makes > > switching problematic (e.g. starting a segment in the middle of a picture). > > On indeed somewhere that does not have an I-Frame. > > (2) is reasonable, but I think if we are not planning to *guarantee* (1) we > should be clear about that, even if you think that in practice a lot of > existing HLS content will work. Agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 23:28:16 UTC