- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:29:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18575 --- Comment #1 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> 2012-08-17 23:29:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/media-source/media-source.html#source-buffer-model > > Some of the things mentioned in this section look like normative requirements > since the magic words may/should/must appear and there is language like "An > exception is thrown if the application tries to update the attribute when only > part of a media segment has been appended." > > To remove any doubt, the entire section should be marked as non-normative. > > (Not hypothetical, I was going to file a bug that it didn't say which exception > to throw, before I realized it wasn't intended to be normative.) Hmm... Many of these sections were intended to convey requirements which is why the musts are in there. Perhaps this means that I should update the algorithm text to make sure these rules are enforced so the 2.x sections aren't necessary? I'd hate for a large part of the spec to become a green box. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 23:29:21 UTC