[Bug 16547] Is there a use case for explicitly releasing keys?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16547

David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|adrianba@microsoft.com      |ddorwin@google.com

--- Comment #4 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> 2012-08-17 06:24:05 UTC ---
The object-oriented API (bug 16613) includes a close() method, which closes the
session and destroys the keys.

I think we can close this bug. If anyone believes close() should not do that or
this does not solve a use case covered by this bug, please speak up. Otherwise,
I'll close it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 06:24:08 UTC