- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:14:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18592 Summary: How much is "enough data to ensure uninterrupted playback" Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Media Source Extensions AssignedTo: adrianba@microsoft.com ReportedBy: philipj@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/media-source/media-source.html#buffer-monitoring The difference between HAVE_ENOUGH_DATA and HAVE_FUTURE_DATA is "enough data to ensure uninterrupted playback". Since it is the web application that decides the append rate, it seems difficult for the web browser to guess when it will be possible to play through to the end. Is an implementation expected to extrapolate the append rate in a similar fashion as one would when estimating readyState for any other network resource, or should one go to HAVE_ENOUGH_DATA only when buffered covers all times from currentTime to duration? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 15:14:34 UTC