- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:51:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16869 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #6 from Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> 2012-04-26 20:51:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't think this is a spec bug, but instead an issue for conformance checkers > such as validator.w3.org. Sorry, conformance checker is bound by rules defined in HTML5 spec. Currently prefixed attributes (except aria-* and data-*) are non-conforming in HTML5. Currently HTML5 conformance checker must report its-* as non-conforming. If not, then please point me at place in the spec which allows for this. > You should file a bug on the conformance checkers which you would like to treat > ITS as an "other applicable specification" as per > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/infrastructure.html#other-applicable-specifications I want prefix-* attributes to be conforming even without applicable specification if they are registered at Wiki page (yet to be created), similarly to another few places in HTML5 which are relying on such lightweight registries. As prefixed attributes are not harmful to anything it is excessive burden to request applicable specification for them, because then conforming documents with such attributes will not be HTML5 documents but HTML5+some extension documents. You can't explain why such document is not conforming HTML5 document to average human being. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 20:51:28 UTC