- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:40:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 --- Comment #44 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2012-04-25 18:39:57 UTC --- Exposing some author-provided machine label for metadata tracks seems reasonable, and not too much of a burden on implementors, _if_ we provide it by just exposing a single field from each format. You don't need more than one field, it just has to be something that the author can control on the production side and then read predictably on the consumption side. It has to be a field that the author can use to provide arbitrary data. For ogg, it seems "name" is the closest match. It's not intended to be user-readable, as far as I can tell, and it's freeform. For WebM/Matroska, I can't see an appropriate field, but maybe CodecID is sufficient for most use cases. I don't know the other formats well enough to comment on those. Note that currently we don't actually define even how "label" is mapped. The idea is that there will be format-specific specifications to define the mapping. The only difference here is that it's not at all as clear what the mapping should be for this field so I don't trust that user agents would implement it interoperably with similar vague hand-waving. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 18:40:03 UTC