- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:05:53 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #9 from Arun <arun@mozilla.com> 2012-04-18 22:05:51 UTC --- Past discussion on the matter of oneTimeOnly or autoRevoke may have used "microtask" and "stable state" interchangeably (vis http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1306.html). "Microtask" as an isolated concept doesn't exist; it is merely a magic word for algorithm invocation. This bug was spawned with the idea of defining microtask more rigorously, BUT mainly as a solution to the autoRevoke/oneTimeOnly conundrum. IF stable state is a better solution for that, then I'm not sure we need to define microtask; it remains a magic word for mutation observers. Unless anyone disagrees with Comment 4 or finds reason why this bug is still useful, I'm happy to move on. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 22:05:55 UTC