- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:06:53 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16674 Summary: Feature discouragement in issue process - can use "too late to add features" as a technical argument in a counter-proposal Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org As we approach LC2 and beyond, it becomes important to slow down the rate of feature additions, so that the spec can be stabilized. Post-HTML5 versions should be the staging ground for new features. Therefore, we should allow counter-proposals to use "too late to add features" as a technical argument against a proposal that suggests adding features. This is not necessarily dispositive in itself, but would weigh against the relative harm of adding a requested feature in a future version. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 03:06:55 UTC