- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:21:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 --- Comment #1 from Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> 2012-04-05 18:21:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Outline of a proposal: once we reach that point, features can only be added to > or removed from the specification with prior concurrence of the Working Group, > in one of the following forms: > 1) A Working Group Decision on a tracker issue, whether a contested decision by > survey or a consensus decision on a sole provided Change Proposal. > 2) A Call for Consensus of at least one week's duration (longer near or during > holiday periods), citing a bug that requests the feature addition/removal and > describes the change in reasonably clear terms. Such a Call for Consensus may > be initiated by the Chairs, or by the Editor of the relevant specification. Any > objection to such a CFC would require escalation to an issue. I would propose that "the point" be at the beginning of the next HTML5 Last Call (ie Last Call 2) AND I would propose that we modify the decision policy to use the proposed approval model in 2) for ALL Last Call 2 bugs. /paulc -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 18:21:14 UTC