- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:24:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240
Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |TrackerRequest
CC| |peter.winnberg@gmail.com
--- Comment #49 from Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> 2011-10-29 08:24:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Status: Accepted
> Change Description: see diff given below
> Rationale: See comment 0 for the basic rationale, and some of my other comments
> for details on particular decisions.
(In reply to comment #47)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Status: Accepted
> Change Description: see diff given below
> Rationale: See comment 0 for the basic rationale, and some of my other comments
> for details on particular decisions.
Removing a element with semantics and replacing it with what basically is a
clone of the span element is a step in the wrong direction.
A way to provide machine readable version of the data is already handled by
RDFa without any new elements. Why not try to work together with them to try to
find a generic mechanism to do this that works for both formats?
In addtion to that, schema.org examples have no business in the W3C spec
because microdata is not part of HTML5 ( just like RDFa isn't part of the spec
).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 08:24:58 UTC