- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:52:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14470
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi
--- Comment #5 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-10-27 08:52:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's entirely up to the vocabulary to specify a property to carry the language.
> Microdata is just a group of name-value pairs.
It seems very inconvenient to have to specify a vocabulary-specific language
markup mechanism instead of using the language markup mechanism from the HTML
layer.
Unfortunately, language info from the HTML layer doesn't map nicely to JSON. Is
that the reason why language isn't part of the data model? What's the reason
why language isn't part of the data model?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 08:52:53 UTC