- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:11:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14565 Summary: Chain of normative statements connecting MIME type to HTML vs. XHTML is broken or unobvious Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: hsivonen@iki.fi QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org I tried to find normative statements in the spec that say clearly connect the text/html MIME type to the definition of HTML syntax and HTML document and clearly connect non-text/html MIME type(s) to the definition of XHTML syntax and XHTML document. I failed to find the relevant definition chains when I ignored informative statements (green notes and sections marked informative). That is, right now, it's hard to find spec-based proof for the claim that HTML vs. XHTML depends on the MIME type alone for serialization and on the HTMLness flag alone for document trees. Please add the normative statements back if they've been taken out (I think there was a chain of normative statements a couple of years ago) or make them clearer if they the statements are there and I just failed to find them. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 07:11:18 UTC