- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:02:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14518 --- Comment #7 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-10-25 09:02:13 UTC --- No, that would be a bit circular. The spec does say that itemtype is an opaque string, so the conclusion should be clear. Given the rather small number of people implementing validators, perhaps deriving all possible conclusions is a bit excessive. I'll be happy with WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 09:02:20 UTC