- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:52:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14502
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |annevk@opera.com,
| |ap@webkit.org,
| |ian@hixie.ch,
| |jgraham@opera.com,
| |mjs@apple.com,
| |simonp@opera.com,
| |w3c@adambarth.com
--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-10-24 23:52:56 UTC ---
One benefit is that you don't have to track origin once you lose the
HTMLImageElement object.
I don't see why we'd allow patterns to be mutated, but I grant your point.
Any other implementors have an opinion? Is there a test for this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 23:53:01 UTC