- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:50:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240 --- Comment #44 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2011-10-23 13:50:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #43) You are free to introduce new elements. However besides, not instead of existing (more appropriate in certain situations) ones. My main point is that if we have an element for an exact semantic purpose, then this element should be used in appropriate situations while more general element could be used for _rest of_ (not all) situations. If we cannot express _any_ sense with existing structural elements, then this at all is not a reason to drop all existing semantics altogether. There is no reasons to _replace_ <time> with <data> (this would be completely irrational). Instead, <data> could be an additional feature (if someone needs it) _not_ replacing existing (semantically more narrow and precise) <time> element, but covering _rest of_ situations instead. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2011 13:50:17 UTC