W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2011

[Bug 14092] I don't think the phrase "bubbling event listeners" has any real meaning. Would't non-capturing event listener be better here? Handlers can be invoked during the bubbling or at_target phases, right?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:24:33 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RGpnd-0002pG-Lr@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14092

Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |annevk@opera.com,
                   |                            |Ms2ger@gmail.com

--- Comment #3 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> 2011-10-20 10:24:32 UTC ---
Anne, do we need better terminology here?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 10:24:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:06 UTC