- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:01:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14518 --- Comment #2 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-10-20 09:01:05 UTC --- Given that itemtype is an opaque string it would seem odd to treat it as a URL and apply validity constraints, but it would also seem odd for a validator to warn about what is most likely a violation of the "same vocabulary" constraint. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 09:01:07 UTC