W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2011

[Bug 14508] The specification should allow authors to just add itemtype as a property without also having to add the itemscope property; this makes using html5 microdata easier and more terse.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:03:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RGSzm-0006UN-JC@jessica.w3.org>

Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |philipj@opera.com

--- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-10-19 10:03:33 UTC ---
Quoting <http://blog.whatwg.org/usability-testing-html5>:

Third, people were confused by the scoping nature of the "item" attribute. Some
of our participants never understood scoping at all, and most of the
participants who understood the concept were still quite confused by the "item"
attribute. We were encouraged, however, by one variant 1 participant's sudden
enlightenment when they saw variant 3's "itemscope" attribute, and by the
reaction of the variant 3 participant to the "itemscope" attribute compared to
the reactions that the other two variants' participants had to their "item"
attributes. This is why we split "item" into "itemtype" and "itemscope",
instead of just using "itemtype".

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 10:03:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:06 UTC