- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:38:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14039
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-10-18 22:38:18 UTC ---
Yeah this was intentionally not written to "pollute" other namespaces. If those
namespaces are interested in supporting the microdata DOM interfaces and
content attributes, and being handled in the various processing models for
microdata, then we can certainly do that. However, I would suggest we wait
until there's a real need for it. So far, it's not 100% clear that there's a
clear need for microdata at all; the only large-scale consumed use of it that
I'm aware of is schema.org.
Any objection to marking this "LATER"?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 22:38:28 UTC