W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2011

[Bug 14481] There should be a h element because h1..h6 imply semantics of level which are misleading when using nested sections. Btw.: I liked XHTML 2.0 much better than this stuff. Honestly, it's crap.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:07:38 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RFwHS-0005fV-V2@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14481

Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackalmage@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-10-17 23:07:38 UTC ---
<h> has no backwards-compatibility.  It's meaningless in old browsers.

You can treat <h1> as <h> and use <section>s, or use <section>s and the full
range of <h1>-<h6> to get full back-compat as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 23:07:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:06 UTC