- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:22:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 --- Comment #18 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-10-12 02:22:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > The others all seem to have the same use case, essentially "determine the > client's performance". It's not at all clear to me why one of these would be > better than the other, or how they would be used differently. One goal for determining the client's performance is indeed to use it for HTTP adaptive streaming approaches. But that's not the only goal. By being able to determine whether a client's performance sucks because their network connection sucks, their decoding pipeline is slow, or their rendering engine is slow, you can better determine what changes to make: if it's the rendering engine, you're better off providing a video in the resolution that is appropriate for the viewer's screen and thus reduces load on the rendering engine. If it's the decoding pipeline, you will need to instead switch to a video that lightens the load on the decoding pipeline - maybe it needs to have more iframes/keyframes. And if it's the network, well then you better reduce your bitrate and go to a lower resolution. All of those proposed metrics provide a better basis for reporting of quality of delivery (e.g. if you are providing guarantees to your customers on the QoS of video delivery), as well as for decision making for the HTTP adaptive streaming approach, as well as for decision making on what types of encodings to actually make available on your video servers. Your example of two video providers having different strategies for how to react to the information provided is one that the market will sort out. If you are saying that we should provide a HTTP adaptive streaming solution natively in the browser, I'd agree. But that doesn't imply that the metrics are not necessary - they still are and introduction of a native HTTP adaptive streaming solution is orthogonal to this issue (and should be dealt with separately from this bug). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 02:22:09 UTC