- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:57:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14429
Summary: Named character set references
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/named-character-references
.html) in these draft contains whole character set of
html 4 specification
(http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/sgml/entities.html).
We can say that html 4 character set refe
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top
Comment:
Named character set references
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/named-character-references.html) in these draft
contains whole character set of html 4 specification
(http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/sgml/entities.html). We can say that html 4
character set references is subset of html 5 character references. But
following case breaks this rule.
In html 4 ⟩ and &lang is declared as below,
<!ENTITY lang CDATA "〈" -- left-pointing angle bracket = bra,
U+2329 ISOtech -->
<!-- lang is NOT the same character as U+003C 'less than'
or U+2039 'single left-pointing angle quotation mark' -->
<!ENTITY rang CDATA "〉" -- right-pointing angle bracket = ket,
U+232A ISOtech -->
Contrary html 5 defines this characters as below,
rang; U+027E9
lang; U+027E8
Except these two named references rest is same both in html 4 and html 5.
regards,
Yasin HINISLIOĞLU
yaskil@gmail.com
Posted from: 193.34.132.160
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 12:57:28 UTC