- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:50:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14419 --- Comment #3 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-10-11 00:50:47 UTC --- No, it doesn't disadvantage anyone, because those types of inputs should just be handled as normal HTML. It's practically impossible for web devs to actually implement the equivalent to <input type=text> in canvas. That little element has massively complicated interactions with lots of things, and is still sometimes buggy in the details in modern browsers which have had tens or hundreds of browser-dev-hours devoted to working on it. If a drawing application is implementable in text, it's almost certainly going to be a bad experience if the text-based editor is running at the same time as the canvas-based editor. If it *can* be run at the same time (say, perhaps it's just a REPL-like interface to the canvas), then it's not fallback, it's an alternative input method that can be useful to sighted users as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 00:50:50 UTC