- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:48:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ian@hixie.ch --- Comment #2 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2011-10-09 21:48:14 UTC --- If we're going to support LINK and META in flow content like the Microdata spec does, which is fine with the RDF Web Apps WG, we might as well support it in the main HTML5 specification and remove the language from the HTML5 Microdata spec. Ian, what do you think about doing this? Also, is LINK and META being relocated into HEAD no longer a concern in HTML5? I know that this was a concern in older browsers when RDFa was first being introduced, which is why this feature never made it into the browsers. Does the HTML5 spec now prohibit the movement of LINK and META into HEAD? Ian, do you want me to create a bug for the main HTML5 spec that requests that LINK and META are allowed in flow content? That way, both the RDFa and Microdata specs don't need the same language introduced into each spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:48:20 UTC