- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:02:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13608 --- Comment #18 from Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@gmail.com> 2011-10-04 10:02:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Given that, and given the benefit of using consistent elements consistent elements? <menuitem>, <toolbar> and <command> (non-visual cases) would be consistent, IMO >for consistent > semantics, I really don't think introducing a new element here is a good idea. > This is especially true since if we do introduce a new element here we'll end > up having to introduce yet another new element for keyboard shortcuts, another > one for toolbar buttons, and another one for the command indirection once we > add that. This is IMHO a non-scalable solution. 3 elements isn't bad. Having those elements would make it clear what content author is trying to do. Also, easier to read the source code when you have <menuitem> than abstract <command>. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 10:02:36 UTC