- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:01:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11124 --- Comment #10 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> 2011-11-20 18:01:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Decision: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jul/0213.html > > Change Proposal: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0120.html Something went wrong here. This bug rightly should never have been escalated to an issue to begin with. Do we really want to be using to micro-manage editorial choices about which there are a variety of not-particularly-strong opinions and that therefore amount purely to judgement calls that properly are best left up to editorial discretion -- and that have no effect either way on actual implementation conformance criteria? This change is something that would require a significant amount of manual work on the part of an editor to change. And to what end? How does this rank as a priority with other actually important that need to be done? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2011 18:01:08 UTC