- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:07:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12715
Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #7 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2011-11-05 23:07:28 UTC ---
Reopening to let the editor consider the request.
(In reply to comment #6)
> Doesn't the 'defer' attribute, and 'onload' events cover this? besides, for
> synchronous cases, separating fetch from parse solves most of the perceived
> performance issues.
The problem is that browsers don't want to download a script that won't be run.
(Some pages use bogus type="" and don't use it as a "data block", and there
it's just wasted bandwidth and time.)
> Imagine if the same restriction applied to <img>.
<img> can't be used for data blocks, so I don't follow.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:09:36 UTC