- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:04:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240
Nicholas Stimpson <nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.
| |com
--- Comment #68 from Nicholas Stimpson <nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.com> 2011-11-03 08:04:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #62)
> (In reply to comment #61)
>
> It states that "This element is intended as a way to encode modern dates and
> times in a machine-readable way" and the first example is precisely about
> "verbose unusable microformat garbage". It sounds like people are using it for
> something else, in which case the spec should be fixed to reflect that if
> <time> is brought back.
I don't see a problem with that spec. The way the element is being actually
used is much more like the examples at the bottom. The examples in the spec
aren't prioritised are they?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 08:06:22 UTC