- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:09:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12824 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bzbarsky@mit.edu --- Comment #1 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2011-05-31 02:09:56 UTC --- Actually, the correct answer may be to use however many are needed to ensure that your round-trip back to the same value you have now if you parse the result. For example, consider a UA that stores alpha internally as an integer in the range [0, 255] (a very common thing to do; Presto, WebKit nightly, and Gecko all do it). It most certainly cannot produce the original floating-point number when asked. What it _can_ produce is a floating-point number which when parsed and converted to an integer in that range will produce the integer you start with. In practice that means either 2 or 3 digits of precision. I agree that this should be specified. I'll attach a simple testcase that tests what browsers do right now for alpha values of 0 to 1 in steps of 0.001; it shows that Presto, Gecko, and WebKit all step up their serialized value only once every 0.004 or so, which means they're storing 250-ish distinct values, as I said above. Note that of the three Gecko is the only one that even tries to make the serialized value look "nice" (in the sense of using the smallest number of digits that will round-trip to the same integer; this means that 0.1 ends up serialized as "0.1" and not "0.09804" (Chrome) or "0.10196" (Presto and Safari)). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 02:09:59 UTC