- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 03:11:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12117 --- Comment #4 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2011-05-30 03:11:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > My proposal for this bug would be to maintain our usual commit-then-review > approach. Anyone would be able to ask for an immediate revert of a change > introducing a willful violation if doing so reduces consensus. Or they could > escalate the bug to an issue. I merely would suggest that you consider also integrating this with the "particularly exceptional circumstances" approach, i.e. encourage (but not require) the editor to pre-flight such changes with all available parties prior to commiting the change, with the encouragement that if such is done that the chairs will be less likely to uphold a subsequent revert request on this change. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 03:11:48 UTC